$5.3 Million - It's a mystery wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma!
Get Joe Pesci down here! He'll get some questions answered!
Charorge's Misadministration ain't going to give a straight answer to any question concerning the $5.3 million worth of portable levees. When asked by Tommy Lasseigne why the Council was not informed in 10 months about the expense, Finance Director Shannon Chaisson gave an answer to another question. What question that was, I don't know. But it certainly was not in response to Lasseigne's question. I guess in their pre-Council Meeting strategy sessions, Charorge and their gang agree upon giving certain set responses no matter what questions are asked.
Charorge, it's the cover-up that sunk Nixon, not the crimes! You may have heard that at some cocktail party or bar. The continual obfuscation and evasiveness being followed by ya'll and ya'll gang will only make things worse, especially if the Feds start asking questions. Its a criminal offense to lie to a Fed.
These are the questions the Public has a right to have a straight answer to:
1. Why did we keep the tubes in place for 4 weeks?
2. Why was the Council not informed within a reasonable time of the existence of the transaction?
3. Where were the tubes placed?
4. How was the location of the placement of the tubes decided upon?
5. If, as you said at the July 11 meeting, we would have been better off buying them, but then FEMA wouldn't have reimburse a purchase but only a rental, why did we not buy them? (Purchase = $600K, Rental after FEMA reimbursement = $1.325 million)
6. What was the involvement of the North Lafourche Levee District in securing the allegedly threatened levee in Valentine?
7. Why, for God's sake, was there no written contract for a transaction involving $5.3 million?
8. If the expenditure was a great achievement of your term, why keep it secret for so long?
9. What does 2 + 2 equal?
Get Joe Pesci down here! He'll get some questions answered!
Charorge's Misadministration ain't going to give a straight answer to any question concerning the $5.3 million worth of portable levees. When asked by Tommy Lasseigne why the Council was not informed in 10 months about the expense, Finance Director Shannon Chaisson gave an answer to another question. What question that was, I don't know. But it certainly was not in response to Lasseigne's question. I guess in their pre-Council Meeting strategy sessions, Charorge and their gang agree upon giving certain set responses no matter what questions are asked.
Charorge, it's the cover-up that sunk Nixon, not the crimes! You may have heard that at some cocktail party or bar. The continual obfuscation and evasiveness being followed by ya'll and ya'll gang will only make things worse, especially if the Feds start asking questions. Its a criminal offense to lie to a Fed.
These are the questions the Public has a right to have a straight answer to:
1. Why did we keep the tubes in place for 4 weeks?
2. Why was the Council not informed within a reasonable time of the existence of the transaction?
3. Where were the tubes placed?
4. How was the location of the placement of the tubes decided upon?
5. If, as you said at the July 11 meeting, we would have been better off buying them, but then FEMA wouldn't have reimburse a purchase but only a rental, why did we not buy them? (Purchase = $600K, Rental after FEMA reimbursement = $1.325 million)
6. What was the involvement of the North Lafourche Levee District in securing the allegedly threatened levee in Valentine?
7. Why, for God's sake, was there no written contract for a transaction involving $5.3 million?
8. If the expenditure was a great achievement of your term, why keep it secret for so long?
9. What does 2 + 2 equal?
posted by Carl A. Chauvin at 11:43 PM
8 Comments:
Has anyone called Bill Capo, Richard Angelico or Rafael of the Metropolitan Crime Prevention Organization, oh wait a minute how about a state investigator or better yet a federal one?
When the dam breaks in the administration I hope everyone will be wearing life preservers because someone will have dead weight on them.
MAYBE
Or as my friends in the U.S. Attorney's office say, if I told you, I would have to kill you.
It don't pass the SMELL test.IT NEVER DID.
DOES U.S.FLOOD CONTROL HAVE ANY EX FEMA EMPLOYEES WORKING FOR THEM??? DOES NORTH LAFOURCHE LEVEE DISTRICT BUILD LEVEES TO ONLY 2.0 M.S.L.??? DOES AN EX LAFOURCHE PARISH EMPLOYEE NOW WORK FOR U. S. FLOOD CONTROL??? WAS THE PARISH CONDITION AT NOON FRIDAY SEPT.23 QUOTED AS..."ALL UNDER CONTROL"???
your question 9, if 2+2=5.3, would F.E.M.A. pay enough to go around and make everybody happy?
who received the commission on the rental of the bags in question, or did the flesh merchant just place the bags in the area out of concern for the residents of the parish
Is it legal for the parish to store these tubes that belong to a private company on Lafourche Parish property and not get compensated? And they want to charge citizens to put in culverts. Where is the justice!
Post a Comment
<< Home