Po Wittle Charlotte Expresses Her Chagrin
Queen Charlotte, on KLRZ's "Talk on the Bayou" today, implied that she reads this blog! I say implied because after wondering "who is backing" my efforts to expose her wrong doing, she whined that I didn't accept anonymous comments on the blog. Sounds like a woman obsessed! Sorry Charlotte, the last time a woman obsessed over me was January of this year and I still have not fully recovered. Or maybe its just that she wants equal time to rebut my dasterdly writing. She didn't seem to have any problems with Daniel Lorraine not having equal time to rebut her February attack. But then again, can we really accuse Charlotte of being consistent, other than, of course, consistently displaying poor judgment?
Charlotte, sweety, you can leave comments, whether anonymous or not, but I have the option whether to post them. Maybe you can start your own blog and post news about your travels far and wide to discuss issues of which you have only a superficial understanding, like your trip to Holland which Windell Curole should have gone on instead of you. You could even post pictures of all your photo ops.
Then, your's truly called in to ask questions about her $15.88 million bond proposal. The mysterious list came up. Charlotte explained that DPW came up with a list of the most needed work and, from that list, the highest priority ones were decided upon and that is how they determined it would cost $15.88 million. But then, what about the list that came from input from Councilmen, except Daniel Lorraine? How many lists are there? Will the list be made public? Isn't the list everchanging? Won't that change the amount needed? Which project(s) will be cut if $15.88 million is not enough to complete all the projects on the list? Why wasn't the list publicized prior to the Council passing the ordinance placing the bond proposal on the Sept. ballot? Had Charlotte gotten her wish, and had the proposal placed on the April ballot, so that it could have been rammed through due to lower voter turn-out for those elections, would a list have been publicized? Didn't the Council add some roads to the list last night? Lots of questions, not too many answers. In any event, Charlotte should fess up that this tax is simply to provide her an election year slush fund she can divy out in ways that best assure her reelection.
I asked her what project(s) on the list were for District 9 represented by Daniel Lorraine, the district which will be saddled with a disportionate amount of the repayment due to its robust tax base. She mentioned some remediation work to the sea wall in Golden Meadow. I spoke to an extremely knowledgeable source this afternoon who told me no conversation took place between Charlotte and the Town of Golden Meadow on the subject. So, in other words, a district which will likely be obligated to repay approximately a quarter of $26.4 million, or $6.6 million, will likely get little or NOTHING? Sounds like a pretty bad deal for the Public residing in District 9.
She denied that the millage could go above 3 mils annually, contradicting what her bonding attorney, Mr. Wolf, stated at the March 1. I have a video tape of the meeting, Charlotte. Want to change your answer? Transcript coming soon.
The buzz on the street is that this thing will have a hard time passing.
Queen Charlotte, on KLRZ's "Talk on the Bayou" today, implied that she reads this blog! I say implied because after wondering "who is backing" my efforts to expose her wrong doing, she whined that I didn't accept anonymous comments on the blog. Sounds like a woman obsessed! Sorry Charlotte, the last time a woman obsessed over me was January of this year and I still have not fully recovered. Or maybe its just that she wants equal time to rebut my dasterdly writing. She didn't seem to have any problems with Daniel Lorraine not having equal time to rebut her February attack. But then again, can we really accuse Charlotte of being consistent, other than, of course, consistently displaying poor judgment?
Charlotte, sweety, you can leave comments, whether anonymous or not, but I have the option whether to post them. Maybe you can start your own blog and post news about your travels far and wide to discuss issues of which you have only a superficial understanding, like your trip to Holland which Windell Curole should have gone on instead of you. You could even post pictures of all your photo ops.
Then, your's truly called in to ask questions about her $15.88 million bond proposal. The mysterious list came up. Charlotte explained that DPW came up with a list of the most needed work and, from that list, the highest priority ones were decided upon and that is how they determined it would cost $15.88 million. But then, what about the list that came from input from Councilmen, except Daniel Lorraine? How many lists are there? Will the list be made public? Isn't the list everchanging? Won't that change the amount needed? Which project(s) will be cut if $15.88 million is not enough to complete all the projects on the list? Why wasn't the list publicized prior to the Council passing the ordinance placing the bond proposal on the Sept. ballot? Had Charlotte gotten her wish, and had the proposal placed on the April ballot, so that it could have been rammed through due to lower voter turn-out for those elections, would a list have been publicized? Didn't the Council add some roads to the list last night? Lots of questions, not too many answers. In any event, Charlotte should fess up that this tax is simply to provide her an election year slush fund she can divy out in ways that best assure her reelection.
I asked her what project(s) on the list were for District 9 represented by Daniel Lorraine, the district which will be saddled with a disportionate amount of the repayment due to its robust tax base. She mentioned some remediation work to the sea wall in Golden Meadow. I spoke to an extremely knowledgeable source this afternoon who told me no conversation took place between Charlotte and the Town of Golden Meadow on the subject. So, in other words, a district which will likely be obligated to repay approximately a quarter of $26.4 million, or $6.6 million, will likely get little or NOTHING? Sounds like a pretty bad deal for the Public residing in District 9.
She denied that the millage could go above 3 mils annually, contradicting what her bonding attorney, Mr. Wolf, stated at the March 1. I have a video tape of the meeting, Charlotte. Want to change your answer? Transcript coming soon.
The buzz on the street is that this thing will have a hard time passing.
posted by Carl A. Chauvin at 2:19 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home